The Secret River by Kate Grenville (Audio)

In 1806, Londoner William Thornhill is sentenced to be deported to New South Wales for the crime of theft.  Taking his wife Sal and their children with him, Will starts a new life on the banks of the Hawkesbury river.  But this land is already home to a group of aborigines and soon tensions between the aborigines and the settlers start to appear.

Thoughts:
Kate Grenville is certainly a talented author.  The Secret River is set in the slums of London, nineteenth century Sydney and the wilderness of the Hawkesbury river but all of these settings came across as remarkably vivid.  I love historical fiction that is about 'ordinary' people rather than monarchy or nobility so I really enjoyed the opening section about Will and Sal's life in London.  Born poor, Will tries to make his way honestly but ends up in a series of ever worsening damp slum houses and with children he can't afford to feed.  London at that time in all it's grime and poverty is portrayed extremely well. Given his background, it's easy to see why Will becomes possessed with the desire to own his own land once he gains freedom in Australia.  The Hawkesbury river seems like a paradise and listening to this book, I felt as though I was almost there.

I thought the way Grenville wrote about the aborigines was very clever.  Although the book is written from the point of view of Will, it's easy to see that the settlers are at a disadvantage in some ways from the start - they spend time cultivating the land when there is already food aplenty if only they would see it, they can't create and manage fire in the way the aborigines can, guns aren't as effective as spears in this environment.  It's a real culture clash with the white settlers seeing the land as free because there aren't fences and farms all over it and the aborigines unable to comprehend the settlers and unsure at how they should react to them.

I also appreciated that Grenville created some variation amoungst the settlers, with many different viewpoints considered.  Some, like Smasher Sullivan, are repulsive examples of humanity, seeing the blacks as animals and others, like one of Will's boys and Blackwood find common cause and admire the aborigines.  As events moved towards the conclusion, the book became gripping reading.  The only criticism I would make is that after the dramtic event happened, the final section of the book seemed to lag, almost as if Grenville didn't know when to stop.

A word on the narrator - at first I found Bill Wallis'gravelly voice hard to listen to, but as I got caught up in the story his voice seemed perfect for Will's viewpoint.

Verdict: Fascinating historical fiction about a clash between a group of white settlers and aborigines in New South Wales.
Source: Library (audiobook)
Score: 4 out of 5

On Audio Books

I've never been a big audio book fan.  But since moving house a few months ago, I have a 45 minute commute to work each way (up from 10 minutes) and I've started listening to books to keep my mind off work and the annoying traffic!  Over the course of a few weeks of experimentation, I've come to the following conclusions about audio books:

1. I don't like dramatisations:
My Dad loves dramatisations, but to me it will always sound like people in a studio making dodgy sound effects with cheap materials, like blowing through a paper cone to simulate wind.  And it's harder to follow the story when there's not much explanation.

2. Authors should not read their own books (in general):
I've tried both a John Le Carre and a Dan Brown book in which the authors read their own work.  John Le Carre has a really monotonous voice and tends to slur his syllables together, which doesn't make for easy listening.  Dan Brown seemed bored by his own book.  I'm sure there are exceptions to this, but publishers should not assume that people want to listen to the author just because he/she wrote it.

3. The trashier the better:
As I listen whilst driving, highbrow literature or too many characters or plot developments are too diverting and I can't keep up. Trash with a predictable story outline is the best, I enjoyed The Other Boleyn Girl for this very reason.

4. Abridgements feel like cheating:
I don't count audio books as 'real' books or include them in my total of books read this year.  But if I listen to an abridgement, I spend the whole time wondering what has been left out and consequently don't feel as though I've 'read' the book at all.  I'm surely not alone on this?

What's your opinion of audio books?
Are you as fussy as me?